A special sorts of rating the fresh new Expanded Individual Functions Questionnaire (EPAQ) was utilized to evaluate brand new constructs out-of positive and negative androgyny. The newest EPAQ was given so you can 196 adult people; their answers was classified on the a classified androgyny. Tall differences was acquired ranging from positive and negative androgynous some one due to the fact better because anywhere between negative and positive feminine and you may negative and positive male someone on the a set of methods away from emotional health insurance and well-getting. These results hold the legitimacy and you may electricity away from distinguishing androgyny toward positive and negative kinds of gender part label.
Sources
Antill, J., Cunningham, J. (1979). Self esteem because the a function of manliness in men and women. Record off Asking and you may Health-related Therapy, 47, 783-785.
Antill, J., Cunningham, J., Russell, G., Thompson, N. (1981). An enthusiastic Australian Gender Character Size. Australian Log of Psychology, 33, 169-183.
Baril, G., Elbert, Letter., Maher-Potter, S., Reavy, Grams. (1989). Are androgynous executives very more effective? Category and Organisation Studies, fourteen, 234-249.
Bem, S. (1977). Towards electric off solution procedures toward assessing of emotional androgyny, Journal away from Contacting and Medical Therapy, forty-five, 196-203.
Boswell, H. (1997). The transgender paradigm shift toward free phrase. In B. Bullough, V. Bullough, J. Elias (Eds.), Intercourse merging (pp. 53-57). Amherst, NY: Prometheus.
Cheng, C. (1999). Gender role variations in awareness into determine out of help availability to your despair. Diary off Personality, 67, 439-467.
Fey, W. (1955). Anticipate of the someone else and its own relation to allowed from thinking and you may others: An effective revaluation. Journal regarding Irregular and you may Public Therapy, 50, 274-276.
Eco-friendly, B., Kendrick, D. (1994). The new beauty of gender type of faculties during the more relationship levels: Androgynous features is generally trendy after all. Diary regarding Identity and you will Personal Mindset, 20, 244-253.
Heilbrun, A great. (1981a). Gender differences in the working linkage anywhere between androgyny, public cognition, and you will skills. Diary away from Character and you will Personal Therapy, 41, 1106-1118.
Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). Brief type of the Colorado Social Decisions Collection, an objective measure of care about-respect. Bulletin of your Psychometric Neighborhood, 4, 473-475.
Hoffman, Roentgen. (2001). The fresh dimensions out of maleness and you will womanliness: Historic perspective and you may effects to have therapy. Journal off Counselling and you can Creativity, 79, 472-485.
Jaccard, J., Wan, C., Turrisi, Roentgen. (1990). The new identification and you can translation out-of communications consequences ranging from continuous parameters inside the several regression. Multivariate Behavioural Research, twenty-five, 467-478.
Jones, W., Chernovetz, M., Hansson, R. (1978). The brand new enigma from androgyny: Differential ramifications for men and you may girls. Log away from Consulting and you can Scientific Mindset, 46, 298-313.
Kelly, J., Worrell, J. (1977). The formulations having gender spots and you may androgyny: A critical review. Record regarding Logical and you can Contacting Therapy, 45, 1101-1115.
Kirchemeyer, C. (1996). Sex positions and decision-making in the demographically diverse teams: A case getting reviving androgyny. Gender Spots, 34, 49-663.
Kopper, B., Epperson, D. (1996). The experience and you may phrase off frustration. Dating that have sex part socializing, depression and you may psychological state doing work. Record from Consulting Mindset, 43, 58-165.
Lenney, E. (1991). Intercourse roles: The latest aspect from maleness, womanliness, and you can androgyny. Within the J. Robinson, https://datingranking.net/apex-review/ D. Shaver, L. Wrightsman (Eds.), Steps regarding character and societal mental attitudes (pp. 573-660). North park, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A., Butcher, J. (1981). The relationship anywhere between androgyny and personal indications out of emotional better-getting. Log away from Personality and you will Social Mindset, 40, 722-730.
Lubinski, D., Tellegen, A great., Butcher, J. (1983). Masculinity, womanliness and you will androgyny seen and you can analyzed as collection of maxims. Journal off Identification and you will Public Mindset, forty two, 428-439.
s, C. (1989). Androgyny and its particular relation to teenage emotional better-being: A peek at the brand new literature. Sex Spots, 21, 25-341.
Could possibly get, A good., Spangenberg, J. (1997). Androgyny and you will dealing from inside the males that have good managerial positioning. Southern area African Record out-of Psychology, twenty seven, 244-249.
Mead, B., Ignico, A good. (1992). Kid’s intercourse typed perceptions out-of exercise: Consequences and ramifications. Perceptual and you will Engine Event, 75, 1035-1013.
Nowicki, S., Duke., Meters. (1981). This new Nowicki-Strickland Expected life Locus regarding Manage Balances: Create recognition. In H. M. Lefcourt (Ed.), Lookup on the locus from control create (Vol. 2, pp. 16-43). Ny: Informative Push.
O’Heron, C., Orlofsky, J. (1990). Stereotypic and non-stereotypic sex character trait and you can choices orientations, sex title and you will emotional improvement. Diary regarding Identification and you may Social Psychology, 58, 134-143.
Pearson, J., Cooks, L. (1995). Gender and you may electricity. In P. M. Kalbfleisch M. J. Cody (Eds.), Intercourse, stamina, and you will interaction in person dating (pp. 331-349). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Robinson, J., Shaver, D., Wrightsman, L. (1991). Actions out of personality and you can social mental perceptions. North park, CA: Harcourt Support Jovanovich.
Rose, An excellent., Montemayor, R. (1994). The connection ranging from gender part positioning and you may observed thinking-proficiency inside men and women adolescents. Intercourse Roles, 30, 579-595.
Russell, G., Antill, J. (1984). A keen Australian intercourse-character level: More psychometric studies and you can correlations with care about-value. Australian Psychologist, 19, 13-18.
Sawrie, S., Watson P., Biderman, Yards. (1991). Aggression, gender character methods and Kohut’s mindset of worry about. Intercourse Spots, 25, 41-161.
Schullo, S., Alperson, B. (1984). Social phenomenology once the a purpose of intimate orientation, intercourse, belief, and you can feature categories when you look at the long term dyadic matchmaking. Journal away from Identification and you will Personal Therapy, 47, 983-1002.
Pick single post
Razor, P., Papilia, D., Clark, C., Koski, L., Tidwell, M., Nalbare, D. (1996). Androgyny and connection safety: One or two related type maximum identification. Identification and you may Social Mindset Bulletin, twenty two, 582-597.
Shimonaka, Y., Nakazato, K., Kawaai, C., Shinichi, S. (1997). Androgyny and you will effective adaptation along the expected life one of Japanese people. Journal off Hereditary Therapy, 158, 389-401.
Skoe, Elizabeth. (1995). Sex character orientation and its own relationship to the development of identity and you can moral thought. Scandinavian Record from Therapy, 36, 235-245.
Spence, J. (1984). Maleness, femininity, and you may intercourse-associated traits: A conceptual research and you can critique of current lookup. Progress from inside the Experimental Identification Research, thirteen, 1-97.
Spence, J. (1999). Three decades from gender browse: An individual chronicle. From inside the W. Swann Jr., J. Langlois, L. Gilbert (Eds.), Sexism and you can stereotypes inside modern society: The new gender research from erican Emotional Association.
Spence, J., Buckner, C. (2000). Important and you may expressive qualities, characteristic stereotypes, and you will sexist thinking: Exactly what do they denote? Therapy of women Quarterly, twenty four, 44-62.
Spence, J., Helmreich, Roentgen., Holahan, C. (1979). Negative and positive components of psychological masculinity and you will womanliness in addition to their relationship to mind-accounts out-of neurotic and you will acting-out behavior. Journal of Identification and you will Public Psychology, 37, 1673-1682.
Spence, J., Helmreich, R., Stapp, J. (1974). The personal Qualities Questionnaire: A measure of sex part stereotypes and you can manliness-femininity. JSAS Catalogue from Chose Documents from inside the Psychology, 4, 43-44.
Share, J. (1997). Integrating expressiveness and you will instrumentality in real life options: An alternate angle towards the advantages of androgyny. Intercourse Roles, 37, 541-564.
Taylor, M., Hall, J. (1982). Mental androgyny: An assessment and you may reformulation of your theories, steps, and you may findings. Psychological Bulletin, ninety five, 347-366.
West, C., Zimmerman, D. (2000). Starting sex. In M. Kimmel (Ed.), The new gendered society reader (pp. 131-149). Ny: Oxford School Press.
Whitley, B. (1983). Sex part direction and you may thinking-esteem: A critical meta-analytical comment, Journal from Character and Social Psychology, forty two, 765-778.
Woodhill, B., Samuels, C. (when you look at the press). Prominent and unwelcome androgyny: A drugs towards the twenty-first millennium. Log away from Sex Degree.
Wulff, Yards., Steitz, J. (1999). A course model of the connection ranging from occupation indecision, androgyny, self-effectiveness and you can mind-value. Perceptual and Motor Knowledge, 88, 935-940.